HIGHWAY SAFETY RESEARCH & COMMUNICATIONS
 

Media downloads

April 14, 2009

New crash tests demonstrate the influence of vehicle size and weight on safety in crashes; results are relevant to fuel economy policies

Download PDF

2009 Toyota Camry and 2009 Toyota Yaris frontal offset car-to-car crash test

Download photo

1/5/09

Camry pre-crash photo

Download photo

1/5/09

Yaris pre-crash photo

Download photo

2/10/09

Action photo

 

The Camry earned an ACCEPTABLE rating in this test; the Yaris earned a POOR rating.

Download photo

9/14/06

Photo from the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset offset crash of the Yaris into a deformable barrier: The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well. The Yaris earned a GOOD rating in this test. (Tested vehicle: 2007 Toyota Yaris)

Download photo

2/10/09

Photo of the Yaris from the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset crash with the Camry: There was a lot of intrusion into the occupant compartment. The driver's seat tipped forward, and the steering wheel moved excessively. The head injury measure on the dummy rated poor, and there was extensive force on the neck and right leg plus a deep gash at the right knee.

2009 Honda Accord and 2009 Honda Fit frontal offset car-to-car crash test

Download photo

1/5/09

Accord pre-crash photo

Download photo

1/5/09

Fit pre-crash photo

Download photo

2/13/09

Action photo

The Accord earned a GOOD rating in this test; the Fit earned a POOR rating.

Download photo

10/2/08

Photo from the Institute's 40 mph offset frontal crash of the Fit into a deformable barrier: The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained well. The Fit earned a GOOD rating in this test.

Download photo

2/17/09

Photo of the Fit from the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset crash with the Accord: There was a lot of intrusion into the occupant compartment, which compromised the survival space around the driver dummy. Measures recorded on the dummy indicate that the risk of serious injury would be high in a similar real-world collision.

2009 Mercedes C class and 2009 Smart Fortwo frontal offset car-to-car crash test

Download photo

1/21/09

C class pre-crash photo

Download photo

2/11/09

Smart Fortwo pre-crash photo

Download photo

2/24/09

Action photo

The C class earned a GOOD rating in this test; the Smart earned a POOR rating.

Download photo

4/3/08

Photo from the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset crash of a Smart into a deformable barrier: The dummy's position in relation to the steering wheel and instrument panel after the crash test indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well. The Smart earned a GOOD rating in this test. (Tested vehicle: 2008 Smart Fortwo)

Download photo

2/25/09

Photo of the Smart from the Institute's 40 mph frontal offset crash with the C class: The space around the driver collapsed during the crash. Multiple injuries, including to the head, would be likely for a real-world driver of a Smart in a similar collision.